How and Why the Treaty of Versailles Differed from Woodrow...

How and Why the Treaty of Versailles Differed from Woodrow Wilsons Fourteen Points Wilsons fourteen points indicated that what he mainly wanted was peace, justice, harmony and freedom in the world and between all different countries, whereas the Treaty of Versailles showed a different view and dealt with Germany, mainly with how the land was going to used from then on within the world. One of Wilsons points said that he wanted for the wishes and views of the local people who lived in future colonies to be taken into consideration, he wanted for all the land to be returned to their rightful countries for example, Alsace and Lorraine were to be returned to France, he wanted the Germans to leave†¦show more content†¦The terms also stated that Germany had to give away land to five of her neighbouring countries, the country itself then was split into two sides. One side was to be governed by the Germans and the other side which included the areas Danzig, the Saar and Memel, were to be governed by the League of Nations for a period of time, later the people who lived in those areas would be allowed to vote for whether they wanted to be part of Germany or not, however the vote was never carried out. Wilson did not approve of the way that Germany had been divided, as he believed himself that all German people who speak German, who live in a German culture, who are used to being ruled by the German government should stay together in one group, not be split up without being given any choice. Wilson wanted for the subject people to freely have a say in what they all personally thought about their country or colony. The coalmines in the Saar Valley, one of Germanys main sources of income, were given to the French. Another of Wilsons points said that he wanted disarmament in every country; he wanted the level of armaments to be reduced. Yet inShow MoreRelatedWhy Did the 1919 Paris Peace Settlement Not Provide a Durable Peace in Europe1570 Words   |  7 PagesWhy did the 1919 Paris settlement not provide a durable peace in Europe? The First World War, was without a doubt one of the most tragic events in the history of people. It was fought on a scale, and at a cost in human suffering, unparalleled in the history of man kind. Countries from every continent, including most of those in Europe, had taken part. Whole populations had been marshalled to serve their countries war efforts1. All these came to an end when on 11 November 1918, Germany finally agreedRead MoreA Plan Of Investigation On The Peace After World War I1821 Words   |  8 Pagesnegotiation of the Allies in order to end the war and examine German anger when expectations were not met. Overall, this investigation will examine how this well-intentioned urgency for peace negatively impacted the future of Europe in terms of its failure to fulfill the promises made by the Allies. Research for the investigation will be gathered from printed and online sources. Sources will focus on both the historical recounting of events, as well as varying interpretations of the purpose of theRead MoreWhy Did the League of Nations Fail?14508 Words   |  59 Pages Boone, NC 28608, USA Phone: +1-828-262 6006, email: elorantaj@appstate.edu Paper to be presented at the Sixth European Historical Economics Society Conference, 9-10 September 2005, Historical Center of the former Imperial Ottoman Bank, Istanbul. WHY DID THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS FAIL? INTRODUCTION The economic and political instability of the interwar period and the rise of authoritarian regimes are often seen as extensions of World War I and the Great Depression. The League of Nations, in turn, isRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pageswhat we choose to call centuries are almost invariably years of little significance. But there is little agreement over when the twentieth century c.e. arrived, and there were several points both before the year 2000 (the collapse of the Soviet Union, the reunification of Germany, the surge of globalization from the mid-1990s) and afterward (9/11, or the global recession of 2008) when one could quite plausibly argue that a new era had begun. A compelling case can be made for viewing the decades